SII-R001 — SII-R030
Every risk codeshould be traceable.
SII publishes 30 quotation-document review criteria so every SII-R code in a report can be traced back to the same review point, example, and clarification direction.
Search a full code, R017, work item, or keyword
Not just “there is a risk.”See where the issue comes from.
The purpose of a public standard is not to label a quotation as good or bad. It gives recurring document issues a consistent language so you can understand what is being checked, what is missing, and what should be clarified next.
Every code can be traced
When a Complete Risk Report shows an SII-R code, you can return here and inspect its basis.
The same issue uses the same standard
Review focuses on document information and structure rather than sentiment or impressions about a contractor.
Issues become clarification points
Each criterion preserves what is checked, a common example, and a direction for supplementing the document.
The 30 criteria are not random checks.They map to four core dimensions.
SII does not look at the total price alone. Transparency, consistency, reasonability, and executability are used to assess whether the document can be understood, compared, clarified, and used as a basis for execution.
Transparency
Checks whether prices, materials, brands, specifications, and scope are clearly disclosed instead of being hidden behind vague labels or lump sums.
Consistency
Checks whether units, quantities, amounts, dates, and scope remain internally consistent across the same document set.
Reasonability
Checks whether payment, fees, and pricing structures have enough documented basis to be explained and cross-checked against the quotation itself.
Executability
Checks whether schedule, acceptance, warranty, change, and responsibility terms are defined well enough to support execution and later communication.
From the report codeback to your source document.
Find the SII-R code in your report
If the report shows SII-R017, use that code as the starting point for lookup.
Read the review point and example
Understand which part of the document the criterion is actually testing, not only the risk label.
Return to the quotation and clarify
Add the missing specification, term, payment condition, or responsibility to the document and confirm the updated version.
Search all 30SII-R public criteria.
Presented in the original SII-R001 to SII-R030 sequence. Search and filters only change what is displayed; criterion codes remain unchanged.
The criteria assess documents,not people.
SII-R is SII's own quotation-document review framework. It is not law, engineering appraisal, price appraisal, construction-quality assurance, or a contractor determination. Triggering one criterion does not by itself mean a contractor is unlawful, malicious, or necessarily overpriced.
Document information
Criteria focus on whether work items, quantities, specifications, pricing structure, and terms can be understood and verified.
Not a verdict
SII does not replace courts, authorities, architects, engineers, valuers, or lawyers in making professional determinations.
Based on the current version
Once a document is supplemented or revised, earlier gaps may change and the latest version should be reviewed again.
Before using the criteria,avoid four common misunderstandings.
Not sure which criteriayour quotation may trigger?
Upload the renovation or construction quotation you have now for free. Start with document maturity and key risk results, then use the SII-R codes to trace each issue back to the public standard.
FREE DOCUMENT REVIEWUPLOAD YOUR QUOTE